Resumen
For decades, the figure of the great excluded third, the reader, has been introduced into the privileged relationship between author and work. If in a structuralistic climate the analysis of the text was privileged, the discussion was later modeled on the pragmatics of reading: the Anthropology of writing examined by the dear Giorgio Raimondo Cardona has now been accompanied by a real “anthropology of reading”. This play of roles has given rise to an extremely complex series. Well, the article intends to present three sub-cases of a further category: that of “sick reader”, or “injured reader”, therefore, implicitly, guilty of “injured reading”.