Libera Università di Lingue e Comunicazioni IULM Milano
Università degli Studi di Milano, Dipartimento di Filosofia ‘Piero Martinetti’
Université Paris Ouest Nanterre
Barbara Le Maître is Professor in Film Studies at Paris Ouest Nanterre University. She has published Entre film et photographie. Essai sur l’empreinte (PUV, 2004), Zombie, une fable anthropologique (PUPO, 2015) and co-edited Preserving and Exhibiting Media Art: Challenges and Perspectives (with Julia Noordegraaf, Cosetta Saba and Vinzenz Hediger, AUP, 2013), Cinéma muséum. Le musée d’après le cinéma (with Jennifer Verraes, PUV, 2013) and Tout ce que le ciel permet en cinéma, photographie, peinture et vidéo (with Bruno Nassim Aboudrar, PSN, 2015). Her current research deals with: cinema and museology; the figure of the living dead; the relations between films and fossils.
Though the post-media condition erases their specificity, cinema and photography, in their mutual dynamic, have reappeared overwhelmingly in contemporary media practices and theoretical reflection, specifically since a renewed interpretation of the still-moving dialectic has become a crucial dimension of the contemporary image. Therefore exchanges, overlaps and bonds between the filmic and the photographic categorize the prevailing paradigm not only in the analysis of the new forms of the image, but also in reinterpreting the history of the two media and of their earliest and perpetual intersection. The historical reconsideration of the connection between cinema and photography demands clarity in some grey areas that so far have been neglected, such as film stills, analysed in the following essay. They constitute a complex dispositif of exchange between cinema and photography, and not by chance are central to much innovative research on the photographic. Historical analysis and visual experimentation have progressed in parallel, both interested in a ‘return to the past’: to the origin of our gaze, but also to a different relationship with images. Hence, having first identified the necessity to adopt a perspective on media relations based on confluence instead of influence, the essay deals with two symptomatic forms of confluence between cinema and photography. First, a form of ‘compressed cinema’ that gives up on time and on the flow of the images and instead is condensed within a single photograph (like in Gregory Crewdson’s works); second, a sort of suspended photography, that takes on the incompleteness, the dynamism and the temporality of cinema, thus transcending its boundaries (as in Linda Fregni Nagler’s Pour commander à l’air).
Centro de Filosofia das Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa
Through the analysis of two case studies — namely, images of Venus’ transit across the Sun, captured in 1874 by Pierre J.C. Janssen’s photographic revolver, and the advent of spectro-cinematography performed for the first time by Josep Comas i Solà during the solar eclipse of 1912 — the present article seeks to claim and substantiate the strict correlation between photography and cinematic device, recalling what Jean Epstein has defined as ‘the lens philosophy’. In fact, both the photographic and cinematic apparatuses, along with the microscope and the telescope, not only surpass the physiological flaws of the human eye, allowing us to see the un-observable, but moreover contribute to the elaboration and development of new philosophical-scientific systems about the Universe, via their images of celestial bodies. I demonstrate therefore how both of the cases under analysis delimit a specific phase of the history of astronomical images. Changes in the latter relate to the production technique and its underlying representation models, thus corroborating the role played by the astronomical image in the permanent dissolution, attenuation, and redefinition of the frontier between photography and film, instantaneity and duration, and the discrete and the continuous.
Through the analysis of two case studies — namely, images of Venus’ transit across the Sun, captured in 1874 by Pierre J.C. Janssen’s photographic revolver, and the advent of spectro-cinematography performed for the first time by Josep Comas i Solà during the solar eclipse of 1912 — the present article seeks to claim and substantiate the strict correlation between photography and cinematic device, recalling what Jean Epstein has defined as ‘the lens philosophy’. In fact, both the photographic and cinematic apparatuses, along with the microscope and the telescope, not only surpass the physiological flaws of the human eye, allowing us to see the un-observable, but moreover contribute to the elaboration and development of new philosophical-scientific systems about the Universe, via their images of celestial bodies. I demonstrate therefore how both of the cases under analysis delimit a specific phase of the history of astronomical images. Changes in the latter relate to the production technique and its underlying representation models, thus corroborating the role played by the astronomical image in the permanent dissolution, attenuation, and redefinition of the frontier between photography and film, instantaneity and duration, and the discrete and the continuous.
Université de Liège
Marc-Emmanuel Mélon is Professor at the University of Liège, where he teaches history and aesthetics of photography, cinema, video and visual arts in an overall perspective of cultural history of the production of meaning. His current research deals with early photography (in particular its non-artistic uses), the photographic discourse, the aesthetics of deep focus (from trompe l’oeil to 3D), visual allegory, and non-fiction film in Belgium.
Lewis W. Hine’s series on the construction of the Empire State Building, published in 1932 in Men at Work, the photographer’s only book, offers a pioneering form of photographic enunciation within the history of the medium that is inspired by the cinematographic language. Compared with the evolution of photographic illustrated magazines during the 1920s, and the use of montage by the designer Stefan Lorant, Hine’s series appears to be the first to have employed cinematographic continuity to express an allegorical idea: the links between the pictures are like the links between the men at work. A brief detour via Ėjzenštejn theory of montage helps understand that just as each picture is a part of the whole series, each of the men is a part of the working class who built the highest skyscraper in the world.
“La Sapienza”, Università di Roma
Francesca Scotto Lavina is a PhD candidate in Film and New Media Studies at La Sapienza, University of Rome. Her research addresses spectators’ emotion in film experience through an interdisciplinary approach, because of her background in Biosciences and Media Studies with a focus on cinema. She has published cinema essays in academic journals (Fata Morgana, Bianco e Nero), films and books reviews. She took part in International congresses and workshops, such as 9th NECS congress; she also organized 12th NECS graduate workshop.
In the 1880s chronophotograpic still images dissected the otherwise indistinguishable stages of bodily movement, revealing both the discontinuities between still images that are hidden in cinematic images, and the details of gestures that are imperceptible to the human eye. According to recent film theory, chronophotography reveals that aesthetic fruition is not based on continuity alone, but also on instantaneity, discontinuities of movement and the dichotomy of immobility and motion. The essay argues that chronophotography can express the dynamis of Warburg’s engrams and Ėjzenštejn’s expressive movement, as well as its organic nature and the qualitative changes it enacts on the body. In Ėjzenštejn’s opinion, the changes that occur in the work of art trigger the spectator’s imitative process, which in turn is responsible for ecstatic flow. The article considers Choros (Langan and Maher, 2011) and the media art project White Horse Hills (Wood, 2002), both of which render chronophotographic, engram-like images of movement through digital techniques. In their analysis, I claim not only that they both emphasize their chronophotographic effect, but moreover that they strengthen the dynamis of gesture, thus demonstrating its importance in aesthetic fruition when it is in line with the laws of nature.
Università di Pisa
From the very start, electronic language and video technologies have provided a free territory for expanding and reformulating multiple artistic itineraries, as well as a point of confluence for the most creative dialogue between different media. Raymond Bellour’s work has been significant in defining the role that video has played in the media context, describing it as a passeur between systems of old and new images, between the mobile and the immobile. Following the digital turn, it seems that the most obvious legacy of video in today’s digital system lies in the transfer, within the logic of computers, of that vocation for integration and intermediation which has always been acknowledged as its genetic characteristic. The computer becomes itself a passeur between the history of photography, the cinema and the experimental electronic world, increasing the possibility of interweaving influences, both practical and conceptual. The essay describes the work of some contemporary artists (Mittelstäd, Vogel, Klasmer), where the choice of a notably inter-media representation condenses the spirit of the history of photography and moving images, in a parabola that originates in pre-cinema to reach electronic experimentation and go towards the all-comprehensive logic of the metamedium-passeur.
Université Paris Ouest Nanterre
Barbara Le Maître is Professor in Film Studies at Paris Ouest Nanterre University. She has published Entre film et photographie. Essai sur l’empreinte (PUV, 2004), Zombie, une fable anthropologique (PUPO, 2015) and co-edited Preserving and Exhibiting Media Art: Challenges and Perspectives (with Julia Noordegraaf, Cosetta Saba and Vinzenz Hediger, AUP, 2013), Cinéma muséum. Le musée d’après le cinéma (with Jennifer Verraes, PUV, 2013) and Tout ce que le ciel permet en cinéma, photographie, peinture et vidéo (with Bruno Nassim Aboudrar, PSN, 2015). Her current research deals with: cinema and museology; the figure of the living dead; the relations between films and fossils.
How can a work of art reach beyond the borders of the medium to which it would logically seem to belong? Following a brief reflection upon an important essay by Rosalind Krauss, ‘Reinventing the Medium’, this contribution focuses specifically on one of Jeff Wall’s works, allowing the author to deal more directly with the issue of the dialogue between different mediums. Through the analysis of Dead Troops Talk, the aim of the article is to demonstrate: first, how the so called photograph does not exploit the potential of its own medium, but instead applies a compositional strategy borrowed from the pictorial medium; and second, how the same photograph undermines the genre of historical painting (to which it is linked via its compositional strategy) by putting the fictitious — and cinematographic — figure of the zombie at the center of the representation.
Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania in Cluj-Napoca (Romania)
Ágnes Pethő is Professor at the Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania in Cluj-Napoca (Romania) where she is currently head of the Department of Film, Photography, and Media as well as the executive editor of the journal Acta Universitatis Sapientiae: Film and Media Studies. She is the author of Cinema and Intermediality. The Passion for the In-Between (2011), the editor of the volumes: Film in the Post-Media Age (2012), The Cinema of Sensations (2015). She has also published several essays about the relationship of painting, photography and film and the aesthetic of the tableau vivant in cinema (e.g. in the 2014 Winter issue of Screen, in the volume on Photofilmic Images in Contemporary Art and Visual Culture edited by Alexander Streitberger, Brianne Caitlin Cohen, Leuven University Press, 2015).
Recent art cinema has produced several experiments in the tableau that conceive entire movies based on its aesthetic. Such films blur the boundaries between cinema and installation art, and consist of a loosely connected string of tableaux which gain a degree of autonomy and therefore cannot be interpreted in the contexts of cinematic narration and dramaturgy. These films are usually categorized as slow movies, and indeed their duration has inspired the majority of their analysis in film theory. Nevertheless, I suggest that we should focus on the similarities between the tableau sequences of slow movies and the installations of moving image tableaux in order to highlight the ways they revitalise the traditional, intermedial figure of the tableau vivant in art, and foreground the single, photographic frame within moving images. Referring to recent reinterpretations of the notion of the transmedial dispositif and to the revisions of the tableau mode in art (and the ideas of Jean-François Chevrier) I propose to contest Raymond Bellour’s idea of the ‘battle of the dispositifs’ and concentrate on aspects of the complex convergences between the traditional visual arts and the new media of moving images that underlies the tableau aesthetic in post-cinema. Taking into account the implosion of the tableau vivant into a more generic tableau style, I examine a set of gestures and actions of folding together photography, painting and cinema that may define the post-cinematic ‘mise en tableau’ (via examples from the films of James Benning, Lav Diaz, Gustav Deutsch, Raúl Perrone, Apichatpong Weerasethakul and Tsai Ming-liang).
The article deals with philosopher Günther Stern Anders’s response to the airing of the NBC miniseries Holocaust in Austria and in Western Germany in 1979. While much has been written about the TV miniseries, the reaction of Anders (1902–1992) has not been the object of discussion. The present article first examines the debate on the witnessing, visualization and representation of the Shoah (Adorno, Agamben, Didi-Huberman, Lanzmann and Levi), focusing in particular on the American TV miniseries Holocaust, and then investigates Günther Anders’s reaction to this controversial fiction in the essay ‘Nach “Holocaust”’ (1979). Anders’s remarks about the miniseries are important in connection with his cultural-philosophical studies on Auschwitz and Hiroshima- Nagasaki as major turning points, as well as his theory of media. It is remarkable that Anders was one of the first intellectuals to develop an interest in television as a new medium.
Università di Pisa
University of Sunderland
University of Sunderland
Università degli Studi di Firenze
Link Campus University di Roma
Valentina Re è professore associato presso la Link Campus University di Roma, ha conseguito nel 2005 il Dottorato in Studi cinematografici all’Università di Bologna e dal 2009 al 2014 è stata ricercatrice presso l’Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia. Si occupa principalmente di metodologie di analisi del film e dell’audiovisivo, dei rapporti tra teorie del cinema, teorie dei media, teoria letteraria ed estetica, dei rapporti tra cinema e altri media, con particolare riferimento ai processi di convergenza, alle forme di circolazione dell’audiovisivo in epoca digitale, alle nuove pratiche di consumo mediale. Tra le sue pubblicazioni i volumi Ai margini del film. Incipit e titoli di testa (Udine 2006), Visioni di altre visioni. Intertestualità e cinema (con G. Guagnelini, Bologna 2007), Cominciare dalla fine. Studi su Genette e il cinema (Milano-Udine, 2012).
University of Southampton, UK
Libera Università di Lingue e Comunicazione IULM Milano
King’s College London
Yale University
Université Sorbonne Nouvelle, Paris
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (Milano)
Ruggero Eugeni è professore ordinario di Semiotica dei media presso l’Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (Milano). Dirige presso la stessa Università il Master in Media relation e comunicazione di impresa. Il suo approccio ai media è attento sia agli aspetti esperienziali, corporei e affettivi dell’esperienza mediale, sia ai suoi radicamenti culturali e semiotici. Lavora sotto questo aspetto a un dialogo tra semiotica e neuroscienze cognitive dei media audiovisivi. I suoi libri più recenti sono La condizione postmediale (2015), Neurofilmology. Audiovisual Studies and the Challenge of Neurosciences, special Issue di Cinema & Cie (curato con Adriano d’Aloia, 2015) e Teorie del cinema. Il dibattito contemporaneo (curato con Adriano d’Aloia, 2017).
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main
Università degli Studi di Pisa
Università degli Studi di Bologna
Università degli Studi di Udine