The editorial team of Chiasmi International is committed to ensuring the integrity of the publication process by upholding the Code of Conduct of the Committee of Publication Ethics (COPE). Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references permit others to judge the academic and scientific merits of the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor’s own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the paper.
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Rights and permissions decisions for Chiasmi International are managed by the editors. Authors are free to reuse their own articles in other publications they write or edit, and no further permission is required. The journal only requires appropriate acknowledgment of the original publication in Chiasmi International.
Subscribers and authorized users may make up to 100 print copies of single articles for any personal, instructional, or non-commercial purpose. No further permission is required.
Permission is required to make more than 100 print copies of any item, or for any republication of the journal’s content in any print or electronic coursepack, anthology, textbook, monograph, journal, reference work, database, web site, or other project. Please contact the editors for more information about the journal’s permissions and copyright policies.
Open Access Deposit Policy
Authors may post a non-formatted version of their article as submitted to Chiasmi International to open access web sites. This means a version in a format that does not duplicate the look and feel of the journal (such as ASCII TXT, HTML, Word). We cannot grant permission for the use of any file format that reproduces page images from the journal (such as TIF, PDF, JPEG). Posting a non-formatted version of the paper allows authors to make their work more widely known without asking a non-profit journal to bear the cost and risk of free distribution.
Chiasmi International is indexed through the following services: Agence d’Évaluation de la Recherche et de l’Enseignement Supérieur (AERES), EBSCO Discover, Google Scholar, The Philosopher’s Index, Philosophy Research Index, PhilPapers, ProQuest Summon, WorldCat Local.
Long term preservation of Chiasmi International in electronic format has been assured through PORTICO.
Pubblicazione trilingue intorno al pensiero di Merleau-Ponty
“Chiasmi International” is a peer-reviewed annual trilingual journal that publishes essays on or inspired by the thought of the French philosopher Maurice Merleau-Ponty, and more in general on phenomenology and contemporary French philosophy. It has been published regularly since 1999, collecting articles in English, French, or Italian as well as book reviews, always featuring abstracts of the contributions in the three languages. Each issue focuses on particular themes or subjects, also including a section of “Varia”. So far, “Chiasmi International” has published an important collection of original work on Merleau-Ponty that is truly international in scope, also making available to the public rare or unpublished texts of the philosopher and its translations. It has significantly contributed to advance scholarship on Merleau-Ponty's thought and to explore its impact on different cultural fields. It also aims to foster the international debate in phenomenology, to promote philosophical and interdisciplinary research, and to strengthen the international network of scholars and researchers interested in Merleau-Ponty's philosophy. “Chiasmi International” is indexed by the following bibliographic systems and platforms: Agence d'Évaluation de la Recherche et de l'Enseignement Supérieur (AERES), EBSCO Discover, Google Scholar, The Philosopher's Index, Philosophy Research Index, PhilPapers, ProQuest Summon, WorldCat Local. The journal is produced in collaboration with the “Società italiana di studi su Maurice Merleau-Ponty”. Print copies also available from Mimesis Edizioni and Libraire Philosophique J. Vrin.
Enrica Lisciani-Petriniinsegna Filosofia Teoretica presso l’Università di Salerno. I suoi lavori ruotano attorno al pensiero filosofico otto-novecentesco, con una particolare attenzione innanzitutto alle riflessioni di autori quali Heidegger, Bergson, Jankélévitch, Merleau-Ponty e Deleuze; ma anche al pensiero italiano specialmente del primo Novecento.
Tra le sue pubblicazioni: Tierra en blanco. Música y pensamiento a inicios del siglo XX (Madrid, Akal, 1999); Il suono incrinato. Musica e filosofia nel primo Novecento (Torino, Einaudi, 2001); La passione del mondo. Saggio su Merleau-Ponty (Napoli, ESI, 2002); Risonanze. Ascolto Corpo Mondo (Milano. Mimesis, 2007); Essai sur Jankélévitch (Milano-Paris, Mimesis-Vrin, 2013); Vita quotidiana. Dall’esperienza artistica al pensiero in atto (Torino, Bollati Boringhieri, 2015). Ha tradotto e curato diverse opere di Vladimir Jankélévitch
is Associate Professor of Theoretical Philosophy at Pavia University, Italy. Member of the Merleau-Ponty Circle, of the Process Thought International Society, of the Società italiana per lo studio di Merleau-Ponty. Member of the board of the following philosophical journals: Paradigmi, Discipline filosofiche, Chiasmi International, Philosophical Inquiries, Epekeina. Rivista internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia. Author of dozens of papers and of seven books: Modi del tempo (Mimesis, Milano 2001), L’evento del tempo (Mimesis, Milano 2005), Coscienza e alterità (Mimesis, Milano 2007), Breve storia dell’anima (il Mulino, Bologna 2009), Merleau-Ponty (Carocci, Roma 2012), Coscienza (con F. Savoldi e M. Ceroni, Aras, Fano 2013), The Voice of No One: Merleau-Ponty on Nature and Time (Mimesis International 2016).